The Research
Mental health, human rights and legislation: guidance and practice
.This publication was written jointly by WHO and OHCHR.
DOI: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/373126/9789240080737-eng.pdf
Key takeaway points from the report (from Dr Jessica Taylor):
-
- WHO and UN are calling for significant shift away from the biomedical model of mental health which encourages psychiatric diagnoses, medications, forced restraints, institutionalisation, imprisonment and other oppressive medical practices – towards a trauma-informed, social, human rights, person-centred approach to mental health.
- WHO and UN highlight the current ways the biomedical model of mental health harms, oppresses, controls, isolates, stigmatises and discriminates against those who have been told they have psychiatric disorders, and who have not been validated in their traumas, distress, poverty, environments, oppression, or experiences.
- WHO and UN recognise that women and girls, people who are gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender are more likely to be labelled as mentally ill, and more likely to face forced sterilisations, coerced abortions, coerced contraception, and conversion therapies.
- WHO and UN recognise that there are widespread human rights violations and harm being caused by current biomedical model approaches to mental health, which includes our psychiatric hospitals, services, treatments, and approaches
- WHO and UN recognise that people who have been diagnosed with psychiatric disorders have been positioned as dangerous, unreliable and unstable, meaning that they are stigmatised and discriminated against in multiple systems of power (including health, criminal justice, family justice, education, employment, finances and their rights)
What changes are the WHO and UN expecting to see?
-
- The end of discrimination based on psychiatric diagnosis, including discrimination used to prevent access to health insurance, accommodation, and support.
- The recognition and respect for legal capacity and personhood of people using any kind of mental health services.
- The essential use of informed consent in all psychiatric services, treatments and approaches which includes accurate and truthful explanations of treatment evidence bases, side effects, withdrawal impacts, possible complications and non-medical alternatives.
- The elimination of coercive or manipulative practices in psychiatry and mental health, including the end of all forced psychiatric treatments, or treatments that are coerced or manipulative (e.g. You can only access support if you take this medication/You can only have access to your children if you accept this diagnosis and take this medication).
- The prohibition of involuntary sectioning and hospitalisation and forced treatment.
- The elimination of forced seclusion and restraints.
- The development of trauma-informed, rights-based community support for everyone in need of support in their trauma or distress,
- The development of peer-led and peer-run support services for people in distress and trauma,
- The implementation of programmes to help the deinstitutionalisation of people who have been institutionalised for long periods.
- Accountability in all psychiatric services and provisions, which includes the establishment of independent monitoring bodies,
- Establishing a system for implementing redress, reparations and remedies where people have been harmed by psychiatry and the biomedical model of mental health
Why is this new guidance so important? According to the document, the following reasons have been presented by the UN and WHO as to why this guidance to move away from the biomedical model is so important:
-
- Stigma, discrimination and several other human rights violations occur regularly in mental health and psychiatric provisions to this day.
- There is an overreliance on biomedical approaches to treatment options, which favour medications, and more dangerous procedures such as ECT.
- Many people with psychiatric diagnoses, particularly those who are minoritized and marginalised, are not treated equally in law.
- Access to justice for people with psychiatric diagnoses on file has commonly been restricted, affecting their right to a fair trial, denying them the possibility to contest detention, forced treatment and abuses in mental health services.
- Psychiatric diagnoses have been used to restrict a person’s right to file a police complaint or stand trial, to be taken seriously, to be protected from abuse, to be believed, to be seen as a credible victim or witness, to give evidence, to have access or custody of their children etc.
- People with psychiatric diagnoses on file will often be treated as if they do not have mental capacity and cannot make their own decisions about their lives or their care – including whether or not they wish to receive any care for perceived ‘mental health issues’.
- International human rights laws require non-discrimination and respect for human rights in all settings, including psychiatry.
- All humans should have the right to reject medical treatment in psychiatry and mental health, and should not be able to be forced or coerced into accepting medications or other treatments.
- There is little focus on the social determinants of ‘mental health’, as the biomedical model has been so influential. Instead there needs to be focus on the true roots of human suffering and distress including oppression, harm, violence, abuse, poverty, cultural norms, discrimination, isolation, disadvantage, exploitation, bullying, chronic illness, lack of access to services and breaches of human rights.
- There has been little acknowledgement of the racism, colonialism, homophobia, ageism, sexism, misogyny, ableism, classism or the many other factors that psychiatry has leant upon and supported over decades. Further, there is much evidence that those from poverty, those with refugee status, those who seek asylum, and those from indigenous communities and cultures are more likely to be positioned as mentally ill, dangerous, and non-credible.
- Psychiatry and the biomedical model of mental health is dominated by Western reductionist medical beliefs that people are mentally disordered and dangerous, which came from colonial rule, and the rise of the lunatic asylums via the church and the government.
What do young women want? Using a qualitative survey to explore the potential for feminist-informed mental health peer support
Moulding, N., Jarldorn, M. & Deuter, K. (2022). What do young women want? Using a qualitative survey to explore the potential for feminist-informed mental health peer support. Qualitative Social Work, online first, available here https://www.researchgate.net/publication/364125679_What_do_young_women_want_Using_a_qualitative_survey_to_explore_the_potential_for_feminist-informed_mental_health_peer_support
Abstract: Intersecting gender and other social inequalities are pertinent to women's mental health across the life course. Gendered violence and other forms of gender inequality in particular play a key role in the higher burden of psychological distress carried by young women. However, the context of gendered violence is often minimised or overlooked entirely when young women seek help or advice around mental health concerns. This is especially the case for young women under the age of 30 years. This paper reports on a research study exploring how young women in Australia understand their mental health, and the scope for new approaches to support that better address their needs. A qualitative survey undertaken with 52 Australian young women was used to explore the nature of their mental health experiences, sought to learn about the strategies they used when experiencing poor mental health and the scope for mental health peer support as an alternative approach to intervention. Responses from a diverse group of young women demonstrated that they understood the role that gendered violence and gender inequality played in their mental health. Findings point to the risk of slippage between young women's understandings of their lived experience and those of traditional service providers, demonstrating the risks associated with minimising or ignoring of the gendered nature of young women's mental health problems..
Women are less happy than men – a psychologist on why and four things you can do about it
Dowthwaite-Walsh, L.Women are less happy than men – a psychologist on why and four things you can do about it. The Conversation (University of Central Lancashire)
https://theconversation.com/women-are-less-happy-than-men-a-psychologist-on-why-and-four-things-you-can-do-about-it-2061511
Introduction: Something strange is going on in women’s happiness research. Because despite having more freedom and employment opportunities than ever before, women have higher levels of anxiety and more mental health challenges, such as depression, anger, loneliness and more restless sleep. And these results are seen across many countries and different age groups. A recent survey conducted by the American Psychological Association may hold some clues as to why. The results found that most US women are unhappy with how society treats them..
From prevention to peer support: a systematic review exploring the involvement of lived-experience in eating disorder interventions
Lewis, H & and Foye, U.Mental Health Review Journal.
DOI: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/MHRJ-04-2021-0033/full/html
Purpose: The current policy landscape advocates for the involvement of people with lived experience in the co-production and co-delivery of mental health services. However, evidence on how to do this safely and effectively for people with eating disorders (EDs) is lacking. The purpose of this study was to explore and synthesis the implementation of ED interventions which involved lived-experience and to evaluate the associated benefits and risks to participants.
Design/methodology/approach: This study will conduct a systematic review of ED interventions which involve people with lived experience of an ED. A total of seven databases and four subject-specific journals were searched using Boolean search terms.
Peer mentoring for individuals with an eating disorder: a qualitative evaluation of a pilot program
Hanly et al. Journal of Eating Disorders.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-020-00301-8
Background: After receiving intensive medical treatment; individuals with eating disorders often require ongoing care to maintain their recovery, build social networks, and reduce risk of relapse.
Methods: To address this important transition period, a six-month peer mentoring program was developed and piloted in Melbourne, Australia. Twelve adults with a past history of an eating disorder (mentors) were paired with 14 individuals with a current eating disorder (mentees). Pairs met for thirteen mentoring sessions in community settings. Throughout the program mentees and mentors completed reflective questions online. Upon completion of the program, qualitative interviews were conducted. Both online reflections and interviews explored themes relating to perceived benefits and challenges of participation in the peer mentoring program, and the differences between mentoring and traditional treatment.
Placing women's mental health in context: The value of a feminist paradigm
Tseris, E. (2023). Placing women's mental health in context: The value of a feminist paradigm. Australian Journal of General Practice, 52(7):449-453.
DOI: 10.31128/AJGP-02-23-6715
ABSTRACT:
Background: It is common for women to present to general practitioners (GPs) with mental health difficulties. Contemporary frameworks for understanding mental health often do not adequately incorporate attention to the gendered social contexts of mental distress in women. A feminist paradigm can support GPs to respond with holistic and empowering practices.
Objective: This article provides an overview of feminist principles for responding to mental distress in women, drawing upon a synthesis of the literature pertaining to the connections between gender inequality and women's mental health.
Discussion: Responding to mental distress is a core component of general practice. It is important that GPs validate women's disclosures of distress, conduct holistic assessments that incorporate women's social contexts (including previous or current exposure to gendered violence), make referrals to supports that can address the social determinants of distress, act with transparency and sensitivity to power, and prioritise women's self-determination.
Evidence shows mental illness isn’t a reason to doubt women survivors
Tseris, E & Moulding N. (2021). Evidence shows mental illness isn’t a reason to doubt women survivors. The Conversation (University of South Australia, University of Sydney)
https://theconversation.com/evidence-shows-mental-illness-isnt-a-reason-to-doubt-women-survivors-156581
Introduction: This article discusses sexual assault, gendered violence and mental distress. Over the past week, some media commentary on the rape allegations against federal Attorney-General Christian Porter have used the alleged victim’s history of mental health difficulties to undermine and raise questions about the truth of her claims. Christian Porter denies the allegations, and he has a right to the presumption of innocence. What’s not acceptable is the use of a woman’s struggles with mental health to discredit her account of an alleged sexual assault.
Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation
Cuboniks, L. Xenofeminism: A Politics for Alienation.
DOI: https://laboriacuboniks.net/manifesto/xenofeminism-a-politics-for-alienation/
The empowering possibilities of young women creating technology-based solutions. The Xenofeminist Manifesto is written by a collective of young feminists who call themselves Laboria Cuboniks, the work argues for “explicit, organized effort to repurpose technologies for progressive gender political ends” (Cuboniks, 2018).